Test results

Test results:

Here are test results on the two files described above:

mingw_44.stored - 116 MiB

mingw_45.stored - 152 MiB

Application	Ver	Binary diff file size (bytes)	PEAK Memory	PEAK CPU Usage	Options	ZIPPED (Max, -9)	Encoding Time (CPU TIME)*	Temporary File Size (bytes)	Comment
SecureDELTA v2.55	v2.55.107.2081	59,161,229	539 MiB	25%	XtremeDELTA	40,687,441	22s	N/A	GUI
Leading Competitor #1	MFC 6.0 Client Sample Built 07-09-2019	102,255,149	415 MiB	25%	MFC 6.0 Client Sample	79,619,786	29s	105,662,186 bytes	MFC 6.0 Client Sample
Other competitor software	v3.0.4	73,418,076	286MiB	25%	-e -I0 -9 -S djw -vfs	73,153,524	29s	N/A
Leading Competitor #2	v9.04.0.1 12-Sept-2019	86,760,887		95%	SPEED: 15 RAM USAGE: 32000	-	32min 57s	N/A	cmd line. Files with different names, stored in two separate folders
Leading Competitor #2 (different options)	-	79,664,092		95%	SPEED: 15 RAM USAGE: 32000	-	-	N/A	cmd line. File have same names, 44_stored and 44_stored in two separate folders 44 and 45
Leading Competitor #2 (different options)	-	78,561,452		95%	SPEED: 10 RAM USAGE: 520000	-	-	N/A	- same -
Leading Competitor #2 (different options)	-	77,691,331		95%	SPEED: 7 RAM USAGE: 720000	-	1h 30min+	N/A	- same -
Leading Competitor #2 (different options)	-	76,266,298		96%	SPEED: 3 RAM USAGE: 720000	-	15h 40min+	N/A	- same -

See test machine configuration here.

(*) CPU Time as reported by Task Manager, v10.0.17134.1

More description here.

Comparison made on December 30th, 2019 using list prices and features included with the purchase of a software license.

Prices reflect the regular license price and excluded promotional offers.

Comparison is provided for information purposes only.

All leading competitors are being used here only for the express purposes of this comparison. The trademarks are the property of their respective owners.